Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Fix revocation of non-persistent contexts

2022-10-05 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 04/10/2022 16:13, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote: On 10/4/2022 4:14 AM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 03/10/2022 13:16, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin Patch which added graceful exit for non-persistent contexts missed the fact it is not enough to set the exiting flag on a context

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Fix revocation of non-persistent contexts

2022-10-04 Thread Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
On 10/4/2022 4:14 AM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 03/10/2022 13:16, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin Patch which added graceful exit for non-persistent contexts missed the fact it is not enough to set the exiting flag on a context and let the backend handle it from there. GuC backe

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Fix revocation of non-persistent contexts

2022-10-04 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 03/10/2022 13:16, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin Patch which added graceful exit for non-persistent contexts missed the fact it is not enough to set the exiting flag on a context and let the backend handle it from there. GuC backend cannot handle it because it runs independent

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Fix revocation of non-persistent contexts

2022-10-03 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Patch which added graceful exit for non-persistent contexts missed the fact it is not enough to set the exiting flag on a context and let the backend handle it from there. GuC backend cannot handle it because it runs independently in the firmware and driver might not see the