On 2/26/2020 6:02 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On 25.02.2020 08:49, Ye, Tony wrote:
On 2/21/2020 11:32 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
From commit 84b1ca2f0e68 ("drm/i915/uc: prefer intel_gt over i915
in GuC/HuC paths") we stopped using HUC_STATUS error -ENODEV only
to indicate lack of HuC
On 25.02.2020 08:49, Ye, Tony wrote:
>
>
> On 2/21/2020 11:32 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> From commit 84b1ca2f0e68 ("drm/i915/uc: prefer intel_gt over i915
>> in GuC/HuC paths") we stopped using HUC_STATUS error -ENODEV only
>> to indicate lack of HuC hardware and we started to use this
On 2/21/2020 11:32 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
From commit 84b1ca2f0e68 ("drm/i915/uc: prefer intel_gt over i915
in GuC/HuC paths") we stopped using HUC_STATUS error -ENODEV only
to indicate lack of HuC hardware and we started to use this error
also for all other cases when HuC was not in
>From commit 84b1ca2f0e68 ("drm/i915/uc: prefer intel_gt over i915
in GuC/HuC paths") we stopped using HUC_STATUS error -ENODEV only
to indicate lack of HuC hardware and we started to use this error
also for all other cases when HuC was not in use or supported.
Fix that by relying again on
