Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Change SRM, LRM instructions to use correct length

2015-08-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 04:46:13PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Arun Siluvery writes: > > > MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM instructions are not really > > variable length instructions unlike MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM where it expects > > (reg, addr) pairs so use fixed length for these in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Change SRM, LRM instructions to use correct length

2015-08-19 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Arun Siluvery writes: > MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM instructions are not really > variable length instructions unlike MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM where it expects > (reg, addr) pairs so use fixed length for these instructions. > > v2: rebase > > Cc: Dave Gordon > Signed-off-by: Arun Sil

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Change SRM, LRM instructions to use correct length

2015-08-11 Thread shuang . he
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) Task id: 7001 -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied ILK -1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Change SRM, LRM instructions to use correct length

2015-08-04 Thread Arun Siluvery
MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM instructions are not really variable length instructions unlike MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM where it expects (reg, addr) pairs so use fixed length for these instructions. v2: rebase Cc: Dave Gordon Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_