On 18/10/2017 10:07, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Avoid dereferencing the error pointer and also avoid returning NULL
from i915_mmu_notifier_find since the callers do not expect that.
How did my patch return a NULL
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Avoid dereferencing the error pointer and also avoid returning NULL
> from i915_mmu_notifier_find since the callers do not expect that.
How did my patch return a NULL value? At least I assume that's the re
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-10-17 16:09:08)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Avoid dereferencing the error pointer and also avoid returning NULL
> from i915_mmu_notifier_find since the callers do not expect that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
> Fixes: 7741b547b6e0 (
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Avoid dereferencing the error pointer and also avoid returning NULL
from i915_mmu_notifier_find since the callers do not expect that.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
Fixes: 7741b547b6e0 ("drm/i915: Preallocate our mmu notifier workequeu to
unbreak