On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:13:47PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ma, 2017-01-30 at 13:47 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Just do a quick check that the stolen memory address range doesn't
> > overflow our chosen integer type.
> >
> > v2: Add add_overflows() to utils with the promise that gcc7
On ma, 2017-01-30 at 13:47 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Just do a quick check that the stolen memory address range doesn't
> overflow our chosen integer type.
>
> v2: Add add_overflows() to utils with the promise that gcc7 can do this
> better than C and then maybe it will have a proper definition
Just do a quick check that the stolen memory address range doesn't
overflow our chosen integer type.
v2: Add add_overflows() to utils with the promise that gcc7 can do this
better than C and then maybe it will have a proper definition in core.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
---
