On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:21:28PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:20:53PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > intel_pipe_set_base() never actually waited for any pending page flips
> > on the CRTC. It looks like it tried to, by cal
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:20:53PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> intel_pipe_set_base() never actually waited for any pending page flips
> on the CRTC. It looks like it tried to, by calling intel_finish_fb() on
> the current front buffer. But the pending fli
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:20:53 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> intel_pipe_set_base() never actually waited for any pending page flips
> on the CRTC. It looks like it tried to, by calling intel_finish_fb() on
> the current front buffer. But the pending flips w
From: Ville Syrjälä
intel_pipe_set_base() never actually waited for any pending page flips
on the CRTC. It looks like it tried to, by calling intel_finish_fb() on
the current front buffer. But the pending flips were actually tracked
in the BO of the previous front buffer, so the call to intel_fin
