On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 02:00:27AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:31:22 +0800
> Changbin Du wrote:
>
> > Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in
> > python.
> > Note such condition is common in python.
>
> Treating both as a False value i
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:24:22AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Changbin Du wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> >> > Changbin Du wrote:
> >> >
> >>
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:31:22 +0800
Changbin Du wrote:
> Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in
> python.
> Note such condition is common in python.
Treating both as a False value is reasonably common. Treating them
elsewhere in the same code block as separate
Am 29.10.19 um 01:31 schrieb Changbin Du:
But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
and '' being confusing.
Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
Note such condition is common in python.
The one is a empty string str(''),
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Changbin Du wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
>> > Changbin Du wrote:
>> >
>> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> > Changbin Du wrote:
> >
> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading.
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> Changbin Du wrote:
>
>> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
>> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
>> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
Changbin Du wrote:
> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> documentation. We keep the
The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
all documentation are
