Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation

2016-10-26 Thread meghanelogal
Daniel, I have already added platform check and is valid for platforms>=gen 9 This subtest is for Watermark/DDB kernel patches floated by Mahesh Kumar .. reference -> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1/ Regards, Megha On Wednesday 26 October 2016 12:09 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation

2016-10-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:40:00PM +0530, meghanelogal wrote: > Existing DDB algorithm divide the DDB wrt data rate, > hence the planes with the less height but same width > will be allocated less blocks and watermark are based > on width which requires more DDB. With this data the flip > may fail.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation

2016-10-25 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:40:00PM +0530, meghanelogal wrote: > + igt_subtest("validate_dbuf") { > + int gen; > + > + gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(desc.fd)); > + igt_require(gen >= 9); > + > + struct kms_atomic_state *scratch = atomic_state

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kms_atomic : Added subtest for Single Pipe DBUF validation

2016-10-25 Thread meghanelogal
Existing DDB algorithm divide the DDB wrt data rate, hence the planes with the less height but same width will be allocated less blocks and watermark are based on width which requires more DDB. With this data the flip may fail. In new DDB algorithm, the DDB is divided based on watermark requiremen