On 15.12.2017 23:19, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 04:39:25PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>
>>> CFL was missing from intel_early_ids[]. The PCI ID needs to be there to
>>> allow the memory region to be stolen, otherwise we
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 04:39:25PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
> > CFL was missing from intel_early_ids[]. The PCI ID needs to be there to
> > allow the memory region to be stolen, otherwise we could have RAM being
> > arbitrarily
* Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> CFL was missing from intel_early_ids[]. The PCI ID needs to be there to
> allow the memory region to be stolen, otherwise we could have RAM being
> arbitrarily overwritten if for example we keep using the UEFI framebuffer,
> depending on how
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> CFL was missing from intel_early_ids[]. The PCI ID needs to be there to
> allow the memory region to be stolen, otherwise we could have RAM being
> arbitrarily overwritten if for example we keep using the UEFI framebuffer,
>
CFL was missing from intel_early_ids[]. The PCI ID needs to be there to
allow the memory region to be stolen, otherwise we could have RAM being
arbitrarily overwritten if for example we keep using the UEFI framebuffer,
depending on how BIOS has set up the e820 map.
Fixes: b056f8f3d6b9