Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] x86/gpu: add CFL to early quirks

2018-01-11 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 15.12.2017 23:19, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 04:39:25PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> * Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> >>> CFL was missing from intel_early_ids[]. The PCI ID needs to be there to >>> allow the memory region to be stolen, otherwise we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] x86/gpu: add CFL to early quirks

2017-12-15 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 04:39:25PM +, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > > CFL was missing from intel_early_ids[]. The PCI ID needs to be there to > > allow the memory region to be stolen, otherwise we could have RAM being > > arbitrarily

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] x86/gpu: add CFL to early quirks

2017-12-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Lucas De Marchi wrote: > CFL was missing from intel_early_ids[]. The PCI ID needs to be there to > allow the memory region to be stolen, otherwise we could have RAM being > arbitrarily overwritten if for example we keep using the UEFI framebuffer, > depending on how

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] x86/gpu: add CFL to early quirks

2017-12-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > CFL was missing from intel_early_ids[]. The PCI ID needs to be there to > allow the memory region to be stolen, otherwise we could have RAM being > arbitrarily overwritten if for example we keep using the UEFI framebuffer, >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] x86/gpu: add CFL to early quirks

2017-12-13 Thread Lucas De Marchi
CFL was missing from intel_early_ids[]. The PCI ID needs to be there to allow the memory region to be stolen, otherwise we could have RAM being arbitrarily overwritten if for example we keep using the UEFI framebuffer, depending on how BIOS has set up the e820 map. Fixes: b056f8f3d6b9