On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 04:26:29PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On pe, 2015-08-14 at 13:49 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 03:38:55PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > This is a v2 of [1]. Since v1 the HW team confirmed that there is an
> > > HW issue in A steppings with the GPU/CPU
On pe, 2015-08-14 at 13:49 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 03:38:55PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > This is a v2 of [1]. Since v1 the HW team confirmed that there is an
> > HW issue in A steppings with the GPU/CPU snoop logic, which explains why
> > we need this workaround.
>
>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 03:38:55PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> This is a v2 of [1]. Since v1 the HW team confirmed that there is an
> HW issue in A steppings with the GPU/CPU snoop logic, which explains why
> we need this workaround.
I've been testing this extensively, and I do believe we can use cl
This is a v2 of [1]. Since v1 the HW team confirmed that there is an
HW issue in A steppings with the GPU/CPU snoop logic, which explains why
we need this workaround.
In v2 I fixed a typo and limited the workaround to A steppings, since
in later steppings this problem is fixed.
[1]
http://lists.f
