Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915/uc: Improve tracking of uC init status

2020-02-04 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
On 2/4/20 9:54 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:28:34 +0100, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: To be able to setup GuC submission functions during engine init we need to commit to using GuC as soon as possible. Currently, the only thing that can stop us from using the microco

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915/uc: Improve tracking of uC init status

2020-02-04 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:28:34 +0100, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: To be able to setup GuC submission functions during engine init we need to commit to using GuC as soon as possible. Currently, the only thing that can stop us from using the microcontrollers once we've fetched the blobs is a fu

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915/uc: Improve tracking of uC init status

2020-02-03 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
To be able to setup GuC submission functions during engine init we need to commit to using GuC as soon as possible. Currently, the only thing that can stop us from using the microcontrollers once we've fetched the blobs is a fundamental error (e.g. OOM); given that if we hit such an error we can't