On 07-12-2021 11:44, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 13:57, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> In the next commit, we don't evict when refcount = 0.
>>
>> igt_vm_isolation() continuously tries to pin/unpin at same address,
>> but also calls put() on the object, which means the object may n
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 13:57, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
>
> In the next commit, we don't evict when refcount = 0.
>
> igt_vm_isolation() continuously tries to pin/unpin at same address,
> but also calls put() on the object, which means the object may not
> be unpinned in time.
>
> Instead of this,
In the next commit, we don't evict when refcount = 0.
igt_vm_isolation() continuously tries to pin/unpin at same address,
but also calls put() on the object, which means the object may not
be unpinned in time.
Instead of this, re-use the same object over and over, so they can
be unbound as requir
