Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Record the ringbuffer associated with the request

On 14/12/15 11:28, Chris Wilson wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:14:31AM +, Dave Gordon wrote: On 11/12/15 22:59, Chris Wilson wrote: The request tells us where to read the ringbuf from, so use that information to simplify the error capture. If no request was active at the time of the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Record the ringbuffer associated with the request

On 11/12/15 22:59, Chris Wilson wrote: The request tells us where to read the ringbuf from, so use that information to simplify the error capture. If no request was active at the time of the hang, the ring is idle and there is no information inside the ring pertaining to the hang.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Record the ringbuffer associated with the request

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:14:31AM +, Dave Gordon wrote: > On 11/12/15 22:59, Chris Wilson wrote: > >The request tells us where to read the ringbuf from, so use that > >information to simplify the error capture. If no request was active at > >the time of the hang, the ring is idle and there is

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: Record the ringbuffer associated with the request

The request tells us where to read the ringbuf from, so use that information to simplify the error capture. If no request was active at the time of the hang, the ring is idle and there is no information inside the ring pertaining to the hang. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson