Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: move *_crtc_clock_get() to intel_dpll.c

2023-11-17 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > Considering what the functions do, intel_dpll.c is a more suitable > location, and lets us make some functions static while at it. > > This also means intel_display.c no longer does any DPIO access. > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä > Signed-off-by: Jani

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915: move *_crtc_clock_get() to intel_dpll.c

2023-11-14 Thread Jani Nikula
Considering what the functions do, intel_dpll.c is a more suitable location, and lets us make some functions static while at it. This also means intel_display.c no longer does any DPIO access. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula ---