> > + if (!vgpu->msi_trigger)
> > + return;
> > + eventfd_signal(vgpu->msi_trigger, 1);
> > }
>
> I think it's a little simpler to write as
> if (vgpu->msi_trigger)
> eventfd_signal(vgpu->msi_trigger, 1);
Good point. I folded that suggestion into the patch.
On 2023.11.22 13:48:22 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> The single caller of inject_virtual_interrupt() ignores the return value
> anyway. This allows us to simplify eventfd_signal() in follow-up
> patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/interrupt.c | 14
On Wed 22-11-23 13:48:22, Christian Brauner wrote:
> The single caller of inject_virtual_interrupt() ignores the return value
> anyway. This allows us to simplify eventfd_signal() in follow-up
> patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara
The single caller of inject_virtual_interrupt() ignores the return value
anyway. This allows us to simplify eventfd_signal() in follow-up
patches.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/interrupt.c | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff
