Hey,
Op 13-01-16 om 13:58 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:27:42PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Currently we perform our own wait in post_plane_update,
>> but the atomic core performs another one in wait_for_vblanks.
>> This means that 2 vblanks are done when a fb is
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:27:44AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Op 13-01-16 om 13:58 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:27:42PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Currently we perform our own wait in post_plane_update,
> >> but the atomic core performs another
Op 09-02-16 om 11:42 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:27:44AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> Op 13-01-16 om 13:58 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:27:42PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Currently we perform our own wait in
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 12:07:01PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 09-02-16 om 11:42 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:27:44AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> Op 13-01-16 om 13:58 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:27:42PM +0100,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:27:42PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Currently we perform our own wait in post_plane_update,
> but the atomic core performs another one in wait_for_vblanks.
> This means that 2 vblanks are done when a fb is changed,
> which is a bit overkill.
>
> Merge them by
Currently we perform our own wait in post_plane_update,
but the atomic core performs another one in wait_for_vblanks.
This means that 2 vblanks are done when a fb is changed,
which is a bit overkill.
Merge them by creating a helper function that takes a crtc mask
for the planes to wait on.
The
