Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915: Split i9xx_read_lut_8() to gmch vs. ilk variants

2020-03-06 Thread Sharma, Swati2
On 03-Mar-20 11:03 PM, Ville Syrjala wrote: From: Ville Syrjälä To mirror the load_luts path let's clone an ilk+ version from i9xx_read_lut_8(). I guess the extra branch isn't a huge issue but feels better to make a clean split. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Reviewed-by: Swati Sharma --

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915: Split i9xx_read_lut_8() to gmch vs. ilk variants

2020-03-04 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:54:44AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Ville, > > Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > [auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next] > [also build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip] > [cannot apply to v5.6-rc4 next-20200303] > [if your

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915: Split i9xx_read_lut_8() to gmch vs. ilk variants

2020-03-03 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Ville, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next] [also build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip] [cannot apply to v5.6-rc4 next-20200303] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the s

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915: Split i9xx_read_lut_8() to gmch vs. ilk variants

2020-03-03 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä To mirror the load_luts path let's clone an ilk+ version from i9xx_read_lut_8(). I guess the extra branch isn't a huge issue but feels better to make a clean split. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 41 ++ 1 fi