Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/uapi: document behaviour for DG2 64K support

2022-01-20 Thread Ramalingam C
On 2022-01-18 at 17:50:37 +, Robert Beckett wrote: > From: Matthew Auld > > On discrete platforms like DG2, we need to support a minimum page size > of 64K when dealing with device local-memory. This is quite tricky for > various reasons, so try to document the new implicit uapi for this. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/uapi: document behaviour for DG2 64K support

2022-01-19 Thread Robert Beckett
On 19/01/2022 18:36, Jordan Justen wrote: Robert Beckett writes: From: Matthew Auld On discrete platforms like DG2, we need to support a minimum page size of 64K when dealing with device local-memory. This is quite tricky for various reasons, so try to document the new implicit uapi for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/uapi: document behaviour for DG2 64K support

2022-01-19 Thread Jordan Justen
Robert Beckett writes: > From: Matthew Auld > > On discrete platforms like DG2, we need to support a minimum page size > of 64K when dealing with device local-memory. This is quite tricky for > various reasons, so try to document the new implicit uapi for this. > > v2: Fixed suggestions on

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/uapi: document behaviour for DG2 64K support

2022-01-18 Thread Robert Beckett
From: Matthew Auld On discrete platforms like DG2, we need to support a minimum page size of 64K when dealing with device local-memory. This is quite tricky for various reasons, so try to document the new implicit uapi for this. v2: Fixed suggestions on formatting [Daniel] Signed-off-by: