Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-04 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 10:12:52AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 03-05-17 om 20:03 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > >>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-04 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 03-05-17 om 20:03 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä: >>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Wed, May 0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-03 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 03-05-17 om 20:03 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä: >>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Wed, May 0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-03 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > >>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-03 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: >>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Mon, May 0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-03 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > >>> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-03 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä: >>> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-03 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks. > >> The currently active crtc wate

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-03 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks. >> The currently active crtc watermarks are pure fiction, and are invalid in >> case of a nonblocking modese

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-03 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks. > The currently active crtc watermarks are pure fiction, and are invalid in > case of a nonblocking modeset, page flip enabling/disabling planes or any > o

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: Calculate vlv/chv intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.

2017-05-01 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks. The currently active crtc watermarks are pure fiction, and are invalid in case of a nonblocking modeset, page flip enabling/disabling planes or any other reason. When the crtc is disabled or during a modeset the intermediat