On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 10:12:52AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 03-05-17 om 20:03 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> >>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst
Op 03-05-17 om 20:03 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
>>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, May 0
Op 03-05-17 om 20:03 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
>>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, May 0
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> >>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst
Op 03-05-17 om 18:07 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
>>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Mon, May 0
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> >>> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst
Op 03-05-17 om 16:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
>>> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks.
> >> The currently active crtc wate
Op 03-05-17 om 15:45 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks.
>> The currently active crtc watermarks are pure fiction, and are invalid in
>> case of a nonblocking modese
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks.
> The currently active crtc watermarks are pure fiction, and are invalid in
> case of a nonblocking modeset, page flip enabling/disabling planes or any
> o
The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks.
The currently active crtc watermarks are pure fiction, and are invalid in
case of a nonblocking modeset, page flip enabling/disabling planes or any
other reason.
When the crtc is disabled or during a modeset the intermediat
11 matches
Mail list logo