On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 06:49:44PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> If the mailbox returns an exceesively large SAGV block time let's just
> reject it. This avoids having to worry about overflows when we add the
> SAGV block time to the wm0 latency.
>
> We shall put the
From: Ville Syrjälä
If the mailbox returns an exceesively large SAGV block time let's just
reject it. This avoids having to worry about overflows when we add the
SAGV block time to the wm0 latency.
We shall put the limit arbitrarily at U16_MAX. >65msec latency
doesn't really make sense to me in
