Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] Support for ns2501 DVO.

2012-06-17 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 21:42 +0200 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 09:18:56PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > you put Daniel address twice into the CC field. > > > > > > Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 20:59 +0200 schrieb Thomas Richter: > > > Includes now proper DPMS support. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] Support for ns2501 DVO.

2012-06-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 09:18:56PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Thomas, > > > you put Daniel address twice into the CC field. > > > Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 20:59 +0200 schrieb Thomas Richter: > > Includes now proper DPMS support. > > Includes switching between resolutions - from 640x4

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] Support for ns2501 DVO.

2012-06-17 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Thomas, you put Daniel address twice into the CC field. Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 20:59 +0200 schrieb Thomas Richter: > Includes now proper DPMS support. > Includes switching between resolutions - from 640x480 to 1024x768. > Currently assumes that the native display resolution is 102

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] Support for ns2501 DVO.

2012-06-17 Thread Thomas Richter
Includes now proper DPMS support. Includes switching between resolutions - from 640x480 to 1024x768. Currently assumes that the native display resolution is 1024x768. The ns2501 seems to be rather critical - if the output PLL is not running, the chip doesn't seem to be clocked and then doesn't