On 10/9/2017 8:39 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 09:33:09AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2017-10-07 08:07:23)
With GuC based SLPC, frequency control will be moved to GuC and Host will
continue to control RC6 and LLC ring frequency setup. This needs
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 09:33:09AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2017-10-07 08:07:23)
> > With GuC based SLPC, frequency control will be moved to GuC and Host will
> > continue to control RC6 and LLC ring frequency setup. This needs separate
> > handling of RPS, RC6 and
On 10/7/2017 2:03 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2017-10-07 08:07:23)
With GuC based SLPC, frequency control will be moved to GuC and Host will
continue to control RC6 and LLC ring frequency setup. This needs separate
handling of RPS, RC6 and LLC ring frequencies in i915
Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2017-10-07 08:07:23)
> With GuC based SLPC, frequency control will be moved to GuC and Host will
> continue to control RC6 and LLC ring frequency setup. This needs separate
> handling of RPS, RC6 and LLC ring frequencies in i915 flows. We still
> continue use the
With GuC based SLPC, frequency control will be moved to GuC and Host will
continue to control RC6 and LLC ring frequency setup. This needs separate
handling of RPS, RC6 and LLC ring frequencies in i915 flows. We still
continue use the *gt_powersave routines with separate status variables
for RPS,
