…whoops, that was supposed to be:
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul
On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 12:18 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> I thought I remembered an issue with this but looked up the previous emails,
> and it looks like that this change actually should be safe!
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
>
> On
I thought I remembered an issue with this but looked up the previous emails,
and it looks like that this change actually should be safe!
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 15:51 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Extend the use of extended receiver cap at 0x2200 to cover
>
Extend the use of extended receiver cap at 0x2200 to cover
MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING_CAP in 0x2206, in case an implementation hides
the DP 2.0 128b/132b channel encoding cap.
v2: Extend to DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE (Ville)
Cc: Lyude Paul
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Manasi Navare
Cc:
