Hi Maarten,
Thank you for the patch.
On Monday 16 Jan 2017 10:37:38 Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Add for_each_(old)(new)_(plane,connector,crtc)_in_state iterators to
> replace the old for_each_xxx_in_state ones. This is useful for >1 flip
> depth and getting rid of all xxx->state dereferences.
>
>
Hi Daniel,
On Monday 23 Jan 2017 09:48:54 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:56:29AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 Jan 2017 08:41:03 Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 17-01-17 om 00:11 schreef Laurent Pinchart:
> >>> On Monday 16 Jan 2017 10:37:38 Maarten Lankhorst
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:56:29AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 Jan 2017 08:41:03 Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > Op 17-01-17 om 00:11 schreef Laurent Pinchart:
> > > On Monday 16 Jan 2017 10:37:38 Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > >> @@ -2512,6 +2518,47 @@ struct drm_atomic_state
> > >>
Hi Maarten,
On Tuesday 17 Jan 2017 08:41:03 Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 17-01-17 om 00:11 schreef Laurent Pinchart:
> > On Monday 16 Jan 2017 10:37:38 Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Add for_each_(old)(new)_(plane,connector,crtc)_in_state iterators to
> >> replace the old for_each_xxx_in_state one
Op 17-01-17 om 00:11 schreef Laurent Pinchart:
> Hi Maarten,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Monday 16 Jan 2017 10:37:38 Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Add for_each_(old)(new)_(plane,connector,crtc)_in_state iterators to
>> replace the old for_each_xxx_in_state ones. This is useful for >1 flip
>>
Hi Maarten,
Thank you for the patch.
On Monday 16 Jan 2017 10:37:38 Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Add for_each_(old)(new)_(plane,connector,crtc)_in_state iterators to
> replace the old for_each_xxx_in_state ones. This is useful for >1 flip
> depth and getting rid of all xxx->state dereferences.
>
>
Add for_each_(old)(new)_(plane,connector,crtc)_in_state iterators to
replace the old for_each_xxx_in_state ones. This is useful for >1 flip
depth and getting rid of all xxx->state dereferences.
This requires extra fixups done when committing a state after
duplicating, which in general isn't valid