This function is only called from port sync and it is identical to
what will be executed again in intel_update_crtc() over port sync
pipes.
If it is really necessary it at least deserves a better name and a
comment, leaving it to people working on port sync.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 2627a7bcb45c..2621b3e5cd60 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -14504,6 +14504,10 @@ static void intel_set_dp_tp_ctl_normal(struct
intel_crtc *crtc,
intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
}
+/*
+ * TODO: This is only called from port sync and it is identical to what will be
+ * executed again in intel_update_crtc() over port sync pipes
+ */
static void intel_post_crtc_enable_updates(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
struct intel_atomic_state *state)
{
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
