From: John Harrison
The next patches in the series convert some display related seqno usage to
request structure usage. However, the request dereference introduced must be
done from interrupt context. As the dereference potentially involves freeing the
request structure and thus calling lots of n
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 06:49:33PM +, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison
>
> The next patches in the series convert some display related seqno usage to
> request structure usage. However, the request dereference introduced must be
> done from interrupt context. As the dere
On 26/11/2014 09:19, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 06:49:33PM +, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
From: John Harrison
The next patches in the series convert some display related seqno usage to
request structure usage. However, the request dereference introduced must be
done
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:23 PM, John Harrison
wrote:
>> This needs locking. It might work as-is but it's definitely too tricky to
>> be worth it.
>
> The manipulation of the list is locked, only this test is unlocked. Do you
> really need to lock when testing for empty? Nothing can be removing it
