Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/13] drm/i915: Make SKL/KBL DPLL0 managed by the shared dpll code

Op 03-03-16 om 14:40 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: > On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 14:33 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 29-02-16 om 10:08 schreef Ander Conselvan de Oliveira: >>> Include DPLL0 in the managed dplls for SKL/KBL. While it has to be kept >>> enabled because of it driving CDCLK, i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/13] drm/i915: Make SKL/KBL DPLL0 managed by the shared dpll code

On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 14:33 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 29-02-16 om 10:08 schreef Ander Conselvan de Oliveira: > > Include DPLL0 in the managed dplls for SKL/KBL. While it has to be kept > > enabled because of it driving CDCLK, it is better to special case that > > inside the DPLL code tha

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/13] drm/i915: Make SKL/KBL DPLL0 managed by the shared dpll code

Op 29-02-16 om 10:08 schreef Ander Conselvan de Oliveira: > Include DPLL0 in the managed dplls for SKL/KBL. While it has to be kept > enabled because of it driving CDCLK, it is better to special case that > inside the DPLL code than in the higher level. > > v2: Use INTEL_DPLL_ALWAYS_ON flag. (Ander

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/13] drm/i915: Make SKL/KBL DPLL0 managed by the shared dpll code

Include DPLL0 in the managed dplls for SKL/KBL. While it has to be kept enabled because of it driving CDCLK, it is better to special case that inside the DPLL code than in the higher level. v2: Use INTEL_DPLL_ALWAYS_ON flag. (Ander) Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira --- I wasn't able