Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock"

2017-09-05 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:51:16PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 04-09-17 om 17:58 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:39:25PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 31-08-17 om 20:48 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:57:03PM +0300,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock"

2017-09-04 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 04-09-17 om 17:58 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:39:25PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 31-08-17 om 20:48 schreef Ville Syrjälä: >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:57:03PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com >>> wrote: From: Ville Syrjälä

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock"

2017-09-04 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:39:25PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 31-08-17 om 20:48 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:57:03PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com > > wrote: > >> From: Ville Syrjälä > >> > >> Make the min_pixclk thing less

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock"

2017-09-04 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 31-08-17 om 20:48 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:57:03PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: >> From: Ville Syrjälä >> >> Make the min_pixclk thing less confusing by changing it to track >> the minimum acceptable cdclk frequency

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock"

2017-08-31 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:57:03PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Make the min_pixclk thing less confusing by changing it to track > the minimum acceptable cdclk frequency instead. This means moving > the application of the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock"

2017-08-30 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Make the min_pixclk thing less confusing by changing it to track the minimum acceptable cdclk frequency instead. This means moving the application of the guardbands to a slightly higher level from the low level platform specific calc_cdclk()