On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:11:45PM +0530, Kamble, Sagar A wrote:
>
>
> On 9/9/2016 10:43 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:21:30PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> >>From: Tom O'Rourke
> >>
> >>When SLPC is controlling requested frequency, the
On 9/9/2016 10:43 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:21:30PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
From: Tom O'Rourke
When SLPC is controlling requested frequency, the rps.cur_freq
value is not used to make the frequency request.
Requested frequency from
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:21:30PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> From: Tom O'Rourke
>
> When SLPC is controlling requested frequency, the rps.cur_freq
> value is not used to make the frequency request.
>
> Requested frequency from register RPNSWREQ has the value
>
From: Tom O'Rourke
When SLPC is controlling requested frequency, the rps.cur_freq
value is not used to make the frequency request.
Requested frequency from register RPNSWREQ has the value
most recently requested by SLPC firmware. Adding new sysfs
interface