Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 11/26] drm/i915/slpc: Update sysfs/debugfs interfaces for frequency parameters

2016-09-15 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:11:45PM +0530, Kamble, Sagar A wrote: > > > On 9/9/2016 10:43 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:21:30PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: > >>From: Tom O'Rourke > >> > >>When SLPC is controlling requested frequency, the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 11/26] drm/i915/slpc: Update sysfs/debugfs interfaces for frequency parameters

2016-09-15 Thread Kamble, Sagar A
On 9/9/2016 10:43 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:21:30PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: From: Tom O'Rourke When SLPC is controlling requested frequency, the rps.cur_freq value is not used to make the frequency request. Requested frequency from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 11/26] drm/i915/slpc: Update sysfs/debugfs interfaces for frequency parameters

2016-09-09 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:21:30PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: > From: Tom O'Rourke > > When SLPC is controlling requested frequency, the rps.cur_freq > value is not used to make the frequency request. > > Requested frequency from register RPNSWREQ has the value >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 11/26] drm/i915/slpc: Update sysfs/debugfs interfaces for frequency parameters

2016-09-09 Thread Sagar Arun Kamble
From: Tom O'Rourke When SLPC is controlling requested frequency, the rps.cur_freq value is not used to make the frequency request. Requested frequency from register RPNSWREQ has the value most recently requested by SLPC firmware. Adding new sysfs interface