Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/i915: Do not compute watermarks on a noop.

2016-03-01 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 18-02-16 om 21:51 schreef Zanoni, Paulo R: > Em Qua, 2016-02-10 às 13:49 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst escreveu: >> No atomic state should be included after all validation when nothing >> has >> changed. During modeset all active planes will be added to the state, >> while disabled planes won't

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/i915: Do not compute watermarks on a noop.

2016-02-18 Thread Zanoni, Paulo R
Em Qua, 2016-02-10 às 13:49 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst escreveu: > No atomic state should be included after all validation when nothing > has > changed. During modeset all active planes will be added to the state, > while disabled planes won't change their state. As someone who is also not super

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/i915: Do not compute watermarks on a noop.

2016-02-10 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
No atomic state should be included after all validation when nothing has changed. During modeset all active planes will be added to the state, while disabled planes won't change their state. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: Matt Roper