From: Clint Taylor
Current 50ms max threshold timing for an EDID read is very close to the
actual time for a 2 block HDMI EDID read. Adjust the timings base on
connector type as DP reads are at 1 MBit and HDMI at 100K bit. If an LSPcon
is connected to device under test the -l option should be pas
Clinton A
> Cc: Vetter, Daniel ; intel-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold
> time for edid read
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04:21AM -0700, Clint Taylor wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 08/15/2017
> -Original Message-
> From: Taylor, Clinton A
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:50 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Taylor, Clinton A ; Vetter, Daniel
> ; Lofstedt, Marta
> Subject: [PATCH v4 i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold time for edid
> read
>
> From: Clint
On 08/11/2017 12:49 AM, Lofstedt, Marta wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Taylor, Clinton A
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:50 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Taylor, Clinton A ; Vetter, Daniel
; Lofstedt, Marta
Subject: [PATCH v4 i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold t
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Clint Taylor wrote:
> On 08/11/2017 12:49 AM, Lofstedt, Marta wrote:
>> We can't have this lspcon as an argument to the test, it will not work with
>> automated testing using piglit as we do for CI.
>> Theoretically we could add a "has_lspcon" to debugfs, but I believe that
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:43:34AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Clint Taylor wrote:
> > On 08/11/2017 12:49 AM, Lofstedt, Marta wrote:
> >> We can't have this lspcon as an argument to the test, it will not work
> >> with automated testing using piglit as we do for CI.
> >> The
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Jani Nikula
wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:43:34AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Clint Taylor wrote:
>>> > On 08/11/2017 12:49 AM, Lofstedt, Marta wrote:
>>> >> We can't have this lspcon as an
On 08/14/2017 07:40 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:50:19AM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
From: Clint Taylor
Current 50ms max threshold timing for an EDID read is very close to the
actual time for a 2 block HDMI EDID read. Adjust the timings base on
connector t
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:21:51AM -0700, Clint Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 08/14/2017 07:40 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:50:19AM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Clint Taylor
> > >
> > > Current 50ms max threshold timing for an EDID read is very close
On 08/15/2017 12:58 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:21:51AM -0700, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 08/14/2017 07:40 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:50:19AM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
From: Clint Taylor
Current 50ms max threshold timing for an E
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04:21AM -0700, Clint Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 08/15/2017 12:58 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:21:51AM -0700, Clint Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > On 08/14/2017 07:40 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:50:19AM -0700, clinton.a.
11 matches
Mail list logo
