On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 02:31:18PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 04:16:17PM +, Sean Young wrote:
> > In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context,
> > we will need two functions for applying pwm changes:
> >
> > int pwm_apply_cansleep(struc
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 04:16:17PM +, Sean Young wrote:
> In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context,
> we will need two functions for applying pwm changes:
>
> int pwm_apply_cansleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
> int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *,
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023, Sean Young wrote:
> In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context,
> we will need two functions for applying pwm changes:
>
> int pwm_apply_cansleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
> int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *)
In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context,
we will need two functions for applying pwm changes:
int pwm_apply_cansleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
This commit just deals with renaming pwm_ap
