On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:26:06AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 05/08/2021 17:36, Matt Roper wrote:
> > For tgl+, the per-context setting of MI_MODE[12] determines whether
> > the bits of a nested MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START instruction should be
> > interpreted in the traditional manner or wheth
On 05/08/2021 17:36, Matt Roper wrote:
For tgl+, the per-context setting of MI_MODE[12] determines whether
the bits of a nested MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START instruction should be
interpreted in the traditional manner or whether they should
instead use a new tgl+ meaning that breaks backward compatibil
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Matt
> Roper
> Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 9:37 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Roper, Matthew D ; Harrison, John C
>
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 8/9] drm/i915/dg2: Maintain backward-
&
For tgl+, the per-context setting of MI_MODE[12] determines whether
the bits of a nested MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START instruction should be
interpreted in the traditional manner or whether they should
instead use a new tgl+ meaning that breaks backward compatibility, but
allows nesting into 3rd-level batc
