Also, please specify in cover-letter, current
series WB support is for TGL+
since WB is supported from SKL+ as per bspec
https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/4290
On 19-Sep-22 6:35 PM, Kandpal, Suraj wrote:
A patch series was floated in the drm mailing list which aimed to change
the dr
Hi Swati,
> Hi Suraj,
>
> CI is not green
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107440v9/shards-
> all.html?testfilter=kms_writeback
>
> 2/4 subtests are passing
> writeback-fb-id subtest can be fixed by asserting EINVAL for i915 we need to
Also we will be sending new patches follo
Hi Suraj,
CI is not green
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107440v9/shards-all.html?testfilter=kms_writeback
2/4 subtests are passing
writeback-fb-id subtest can be fixed by asserting EINVAL for i915
we need to fix writeback-check-output first
On local validation, we were getti
Hi Jani,
All patches have been reviewed by Arun it would be great if you could have a
Look and give an ACK.
Regards,
Suraj Kandpal
> Subject: [PATCH v6 0/3] Enable Pipewriteback
>
> A patch series was floated in the drm mailing list which aimed to change the
> drm_connector and drm_encoder fields
A patch series was floated in the drm mailing list which aimed to change
the drm_connector and drm_encoder fields to pointer in the
drm_connector_writeback structure, this received a huge pushback from
the community but since i915 expects each connector present in the
drm_device list to be a intel_
