Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/i915/icl: Define MOCS table for Icelake

2018-12-13 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:46 AM Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-12-10 17:17:29) > > > > On 07/11/2018 15:16, Tomasz Lis wrote: > > > The table has been unified across OSes to minimize virtualization > > > overhead. > > > > > > The MOCS table is now published as part of bsp

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/i915/icl: Define MOCS table for Icelake

2018-12-13 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-12-10 17:17:29) > > On 07/11/2018 15:16, Tomasz Lis wrote: > > The table has been unified across OSes to minimize virtualization overhead. > > > > The MOCS table is now published as part of bspec, and versioned. Entries > > are supposed to never be modified, but new o

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/i915/icl: Define MOCS table for Icelake

2018-12-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 07/11/2018 15:16, Tomasz Lis wrote: The table has been unified across OSes to minimize virtualization overhead. The MOCS table is now published as part of bspec, and versioned. Entries are supposed to never be modified, but new ones can be added. Adding entries increases table version. The p

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/i915/icl: Define MOCS table for Icelake

2018-11-07 Thread Tomasz Lis
The table has been unified across OSes to minimize virtualization overhead. The MOCS table is now published as part of bspec, and versioned. Entries are supposed to never be modified, but new ones can be added. Adding entries increases table version. The patch includes version 1 entries. Meaning