Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/i915: Add per context timelines to fence object

2016-02-24 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 22-02-16 om 15:33 schreef John Harrison: > On 18/02/2016 14:49, Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 02:24:06PM +, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: >>> From: John Harrison >>> >>> The fence object used inside the request structure requires a sequence

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/i915: Add per context timelines to fence object

2016-02-22 Thread John Harrison
On 18/02/2016 14:49, Chris Wilson wrote: On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 02:24:06PM +, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison The fence object used inside the request structure requires a sequence number. Although this is not used by the i915 driver

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/i915: Add per context timelines to fence object

2016-02-18 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 02:24:06PM +, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: > From: John Harrison > > The fence object used inside the request structure requires a sequence > number. Although this is not used by the i915 driver itself, it could > potentially be used by

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/i915: Add per context timelines to fence object

2016-02-18 Thread John . C . Harrison
From: John Harrison The fence object used inside the request structure requires a sequence number. Although this is not used by the i915 driver itself, it could potentially be used by non-i915 code if the fence is passed outside of the driver. This is the intention as