[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/3] drm/i915: set optimum eu/slice/sub-slice configuration based on load type

2020-03-13 Thread srinivasan . s
From: Srinivasan S This patch will select optimum eu/slice/sub-slice configuration based on type of load (low, medium, high) as input. Based on our readings and experiments we have predefined set of optimum configuration for each platform(CHT, KBL). i915_gem_context_set_load_type will select opti

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/3] drm/i915: set optimum eu/slice/sub-slice configuration based on load type

2020-03-16 Thread Ankit Navik
This patch will select optimum eu/slice/sub-slice configuration based on type of load (low, medium, high) as input. Based on our readings and experiments we have predefined set of optimum configuration for each platform(CHT, KBL). i915_gem_context_set_load_type will select optimum configuration fro

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/3] drm/i915: set optimum eu/slice/sub-slice configuration based on load type

2020-03-16 Thread Ankit Navik
This patch will select optimum eu/slice/sub-slice configuration based on type of load (low, medium, high) as input. Based on our readings and experiments we have predefined set of optimum configuration for each platform(CHT, KBL). i915_gem_context_set_load_type will select optimum configuration fro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/3] drm/i915: set optimum eu/slice/sub-slice configuration based on load type

2020-03-16 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Ankit, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next] [also build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip next-20200316] [cannot apply to v5.6-rc6] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the s