Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next for 4.17

Weird. I try to apply the patches one by one on drm-intel-next-2018-04-13. I didn't get any conflicts... Let me dig more.. On 04/19/18 17:50, Zhi Wang wrote: Thanks, Let me discuss with Zhenyu about how to deal with this. It must be the git rebase I've done which causes the commiter change

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next for 4.17

On 2018.04.19 12:34:16 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Zhi Wang wrote: > > Hi: > > > > Here is the pull request of gvt-next for 4.17 with some new features and > > optimizations. > > > > Thanks, > > Zhi. > > > > -- > > The following changes since commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next for 4.17

Thanks, Let me discuss with Zhenyu about how to deal with this. It must be the git rebase I've done which causes the commiter change without new signoff-by. Thanks, Zhi. On 04/19/18 17:34, Jani Nikula wrote: On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Zhi Wang wrote: Hi: Here is the pull

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next for 4.17

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Zhi Wang wrote: > Hi: > > Here is the pull request of gvt-next for 4.17 with some new features and > optimizations. > > Thanks, > Zhi. > > -- > The following changes since commit fadec6eefe232696c5c471b40df33e6db616e854: > >drm/i915: Update

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next for 4.17

Sorry it's gvt-next, so it should be for 4.18. Thanks, Zhi. On 04/19/18 17:17, Zhi Wang wrote: Hi: Here is the pull request of gvt-next for 4.17 with some new features and optimizations. Thanks, Zhi. -- The following changes since commit fadec6eefe232696c5c471b40df33e6db616e854:

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next for 4.17

Hi: Here is the pull request of gvt-next for 4.17 with some new features and optimizations. Thanks, Zhi. -- The following changes since commit fadec6eefe232696c5c471b40df33e6db616e854: drm/i915: Update DRIVER_DATE to 20180413 (2018-04-13 12:20:58 +0300) are available in the git

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next for 4.17

Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-03-09 12:30:13) > > Joonas, so did this miss the deadline for v4.17? You're not making > another pull request? As discussed in the IRC, it got merged. Only in the final pull request generation I'll summarize all the intermediate tags. Regards, Joonas > > BR, > Jani.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next for 4.17

Joonas, so did this miss the deadline for v4.17? You're not making another pull request? BR, Jani. On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Pulled. > > Regards, Joonas > > Quoting Zhenyu Wang (2018-03-08 04:31:52) >> >> Hi, >> >> Here's gvt-next update

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next for 4.17

Pulled. Regards, Joonas Quoting Zhenyu Wang (2018-03-08 04:31:52) > > Hi, > > Here's gvt-next update for 4.17. Biggest update is for huge code > refactor of shadow ppgtt from Changbin which is the most obscured > part, and with KBL context save/restore improvement from Weinan, > with other

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next for 4.17

Hi, Here's gvt-next update for 4.17. Biggest update is for huge code refactor of shadow ppgtt from Changbin which is the most obscured part, and with KBL context save/restore improvement from Weinan, with other fixes. Thanks. -- The following changes since commit