Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Non-upstream ChromeOS patches from 3.8

2013-08-16 Thread Ausmus, James
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 05:30:25PM -0700, james.aus...@intel.com wrote: > >> Hello All- > >> > >> I'm trying to determine if the ChromeOS-only patches being carried by > >> Google still make sens

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Non-upstream ChromeOS patches from 3.8

2013-08-16 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 05:30:25PM -0700, james.aus...@intel.com wrote: >> Hello All- >> >> I'm trying to determine if the ChromeOS-only patches being carried by >> Google still make sense and are the right way to do things in the 3.11+ >> world, and J

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Non-upstream ChromeOS patches from 3.8

2013-08-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 05:30:25PM -0700, james.aus...@intel.com wrote: > Hello All- > > I'm trying to determine if the ChromeOS-only patches being carried by > Google still make sense and are the right way to do things in the 3.11+ > world, and Jesse asked me to forward the patches to the list f

[Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Non-upstream ChromeOS patches from 3.8

2013-08-15 Thread james . ausmus
Hello All- I'm trying to determine if the ChromeOS-only patches being carried by Google still make sense and are the right way to do things in the 3.11+ world, and Jesse asked me to forward the patches to the list for evaluation and potential upstreaming. Thanks! -James [PATCH] drm/i915: Only