From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>

More removal of implicit dev_priv.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
index 84d4f549eb21..432037e5d0a5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -325,11 +325,11 @@ static void bdw_get_stolen_reserved(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
        *size = stolen_top - *base;
 }
 
-static void icl_get_stolen_reserved(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+static void icl_get_stolen_reserved(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
                                    resource_size_t *base,
                                    resource_size_t *size)
 {
-       u64 reg_val = I915_READ64(GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED);
+       u64 reg_val = intel_uncore_read64(&i915->uncore, GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED);
 
        DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED = 0x%016llx\n", reg_val);
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to