On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 02:55:40PM +0530, Kannan, Vandana wrote:
> I went through the LVDS and DSI parts. If software delays are used for both,
> would it really add more value to have the delays in a function in
> intel_panel.c and call whenever required ?
> I'm thinking directly calling a msleep
On 20-Oct-14 9:38 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:20:06PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
Actually set values into PPS related registers. This implementation is
equivalent to intel_dp_panel_power_sequencer_registers where the values
saved intially are written into registers.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:08:48PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:20:06PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
> > Actually set values into PPS related registers. This implementation is
> > equivalent to intel_dp_panel_power_sequencer_registers where the values
> > saved intially
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:08:48PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:20:06PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
> > Actually set values into PPS related registers. This implementation is
> > equivalent to intel_dp_panel_power_sequencer_registers where the values
> > saved intially
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:20:06PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
> Actually set values into PPS related registers. This implementation is
> equivalent to intel_dp_panel_power_sequencer_registers where the values
> saved intially are written into registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan
> ---
>
Actually set values into PPS related registers. This implementation is
equivalent to intel_dp_panel_power_sequencer_registers where the values
saved intially are written into registers.
Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c| 80 ++--
