On 25.05.2021 20:08, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 12:13:29PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
>> From: Michal Wajdeczko
>>
>> In upcoming patch we will allow more CTB requests to be sent in
>> parallel to the GuC for procesing, so we shouldn't assume any more
>> that GuC will alway
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 12:13:29PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> From: Michal Wajdeczko
>
> In upcoming patch we will allow more CTB requests to be sent in
> parallel to the GuC for procesing, so we shouldn't assume any more
> that GuC will always reply without 10ms.
>
> Use bigger value from CO
From: Michal Wajdeczko
In upcoming patch we will allow more CTB requests to be sent in
parallel to the GuC for procesing, so we shouldn't assume any more
that GuC will always reply without 10ms.
Use bigger value from CONFIG_DRM_I915_HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL instead.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko
S
