On Jan 12, 2017 8:04 AM, "Chris Wilson" wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:52:53PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> >> +static int i915_gem_context_enable_svm(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
> >> +{
> >> + int
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:52:53PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> >> +static int i915_gem_context_enable_svm(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (!HAS_SVM(ctx->i915))
>
Chris Wilson writes:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:52:53PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> +static int i915_gem_context_enable_svm(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
>> +{
>> +int ret;
>> +
>> +if (!HAS_SVM(ctx->i915))
>> +return -ENODEV;
>
> How does legacy execbuf work with an svm
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:52:53PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> +static int i915_gem_context_enable_svm(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!HAS_SVM(ctx->i915))
> + return -ENODEV;
How does legacy execbuf work with an svm context? It will write the
ppgt
From: Jesse Barnes
Use David's new IOMMU layer functions for supporting SVM in i915.
TODO:
error record collection for failing SVM contexts
callback handling for fatal faults
scheduling
v2: integrate David's core IOMMU support
make sure we don't clobber the PASID in the context reg st
