On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 10:16:14AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:25 AM Matthew Brost wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:33:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/05/2021 20:14, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > > Reset implementation for new GuC interface. Thi
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:25 AM Matthew Brost wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:33:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >
> > On 06/05/2021 20:14, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > Reset implementation for new GuC interface. This is the legacy reset
> > > implementation which is called when the i915 ow
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:33:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2021 20:14, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Reset implementation for new GuC interface. This is the legacy reset
> > implementation which is called when the i915 owns the engine hang check.
> > Future patches will offload the en
On 06/05/2021 20:14, Matthew Brost wrote:
Reset implementation for new GuC interface. This is the legacy reset
implementation which is called when the i915 owns the engine hang check.
Future patches will offload the engine hang check to GuC but we will
continue to maintain this legacy path as a
Reset implementation for new GuC interface. This is the legacy reset
implementation which is called when the i915 owns the engine hang check.
Future patches will offload the engine hang check to GuC but we will
continue to maintain this legacy path as a fallback and this code path
is also required