Hi Chris,
On Friday, November 1, 2019 11:02:45 AM CET Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:54)
> > Commit a355b2d6eb42 ("igt/gem_exec_reloc: Filter out unavailable
> > addresses for !ppgtt") introduced filtering of addresses possibly
> > occupied by other users of
Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-11-04 09:13:28)
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Friday, November 1, 2019 11:02:45 AM CET Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:54)
> > > Commit a355b2d6eb42 ("igt/gem_exec_reloc: Filter out unavailable
> > > addresses for !ppgtt") introduced
Hi Vanshi,
On Thursday, October 31, 2019 5:59:50 PM CET Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
> May be this patch can just be merged with the other patch in this series
> that changes gem_exec_reloc.
Even if both patches are closely related to possibly incorrect alignment in
use, I think each one resolves it
Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:54)
> Commit a355b2d6eb42 ("igt/gem_exec_reloc: Filter out unavailable
> addresses for !ppgtt") introduced filtering of addresses possibly
> occupied by other users of shared GTT. Unfortunately, that filtering
> doesn't distinguish between actually
May be this patch can just be merged with the other patch in this series
that changes gem_exec_reloc.
Vanshi
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 04:28:54PM +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
Commit a355b2d6eb42 ("igt/gem_exec_reloc: Filter out unavailable
addresses for !ppgtt") introduced filtering of
Commit a355b2d6eb42 ("igt/gem_exec_reloc: Filter out unavailable
addresses for !ppgtt") introduced filtering of addresses possibly
occupied by other users of shared GTT. Unfortunately, that filtering
doesn't distinguish between actually occupied addresses and otherwise
invalid softpin offsets.
