Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-11-04 09:39:32)
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Friday, November 1, 2019 10:42:18 AM CET Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:57)
> > > exec-shared-gtt-* subtests use hardcoded values for object size and
> > > softpin offset, based on 4kB GTT
Hi Chris,
On Friday, November 1, 2019 10:42:18 AM CET Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:57)
> > exec-shared-gtt-* subtests use hardcoded values for object size and
> > softpin offset, based on 4kB GTT alignment assumption. That may result
> > in those subtests
Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-11-01 09:42:18)
> Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:57)
> > exec-shared-gtt-* subtests use hardcoded values for object size and
> > softpin offset, based on 4kB GTT alignment assumption. That may result
> > in those subtests failing when run on future backing
Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:57)
> exec-shared-gtt-* subtests use hardcoded values for object size and
> softpin offset, based on 4kB GTT alignment assumption. That may result
> in those subtests failing when run on future backing stores with
> possibly larger minimum page sizes.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 04:28:57PM +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
exec-shared-gtt-* subtests use hardcoded values for object size and
softpin offset, based on 4kB GTT alignment assumption. That may result
in those subtests failing when run on future backing stores with
possibly larger minimum
exec-shared-gtt-* subtests use hardcoded values for object size and
softpin offset, based on 4kB GTT alignment assumption. That may result
in those subtests failing when run on future backing stores with
possibly larger minimum page sizes.
Replace hardcoded constants with values calculated from
