Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v2] drm: Enable dynamic debug for DRM_[DEV]_DEBUG*

2016-12-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:57:25AM +, Robert Bragg wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:35:29PM +, Robert Bragg wrote: > > > This is still missing corresponding documentation changes, and I haven't > > > moved anything to drm_pri

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v2] drm: Enable dynamic debug for DRM_[DEV]_DEBUG*

2016-12-08 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
Hi, On 07/12/2016 18:35, Robert Bragg wrote: This is still missing corresponding documentation changes, and I haven't moved anything to drm_print.h yet, as suggested. Sending out with a few functional improvements first to get agreement before documenting anything (changes summarised in v2: se

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v2] drm: Enable dynamic debug for DRM_[DEV]_DEBUG*

2016-12-08 Thread Robert Bragg
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:35:29PM +, Robert Bragg wrote: > > This is still missing corresponding documentation changes, and I haven't > > moved anything to drm_print.h yet, as suggested. > > > > Sending out with a few functional improv

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC v2] drm: Enable dynamic debug for DRM_[DEV]_DEBUG*

2016-12-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:35:29PM +, Robert Bragg wrote: > This is still missing corresponding documentation changes, and I haven't > moved anything to drm_print.h yet, as suggested. > > Sending out with a few functional improvements first to get agreement > before documenting anything (chang

[Intel-gfx] [RFC v2] drm: Enable dynamic debug for DRM_[DEV]_DEBUG*

2016-12-07 Thread Robert Bragg
This is still missing corresponding documentation changes, and I haven't moved anything to drm_print.h yet, as suggested. Sending out with a few functional improvements first to get agreement before documenting anything (changes summarised in v2: section below) In particular, affecting the output