On 2010.11.04 16:52:51 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
Having the error there was to make sure people noticed and I
could find out just how many SNB revisions failed. I presume you have a
rev 8?
Yes, rev 8 here.
FYI, rev 9 desktop sandybridge doesn't show this issue so far.
It just reads back
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 21:09:16 +0800, Zhenyu Wang zhen...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 2010.11.04 16:52:51 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
Having the error there was to make sure people noticed and I
could find out just how many SNB revisions failed. I presume you have a
rev 8?
Yes, rev 8 here.
The commit below causes my Sandybridge system to fail at initial KMS
initialization:
Aug 27 18:58:04 livid kernel: [9.099032] i915 :00:02.0: irq 42 for MSI/M
SI-X
Aug 27 18:58:04 livid kernel: [9.099086] [drm:init_ring_common] *ERROR*
render ring initialization failed ctl
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:03:45 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
The commit below causes my Sandybridge system to fail at initial KMS
initialization:
Aug 27 18:58:04 livid kernel: [9.099032] i915 :00:02.0: irq 42 for
MSI/M
SI-X
Aug 27 18:58:04 livid kernel: [9.099086]
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:41:45 +, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
Find a hw engineer, and ask him nicely why his ringbuffer registers return
0 *most* of the time.
Ugh.
Having the error there was to make sure people noticed and I
could find out just how many SNB revisions
