Re: [Intel-gfx] [igvt-g-dev] [PULL] GVT-g device model fixes

2016-11-17 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2016.11.17 08:55:26 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Just to clarify the process: This week we have the cut-off for feature > work for 4.10. Bugfixes are of course always welcome. But if you think > it's serious enough I'm happy to wait. > yeah, I'd like to include those for initial 4.10 merge.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [igvt-g-dev] [PULL] GVT-g device model fixes

2016-11-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:51:28PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > On 2016.11.16 15:50:27 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Please pull current GVT-g device model fixes. > > > > Sorry, pls hold on this as found a possible conflict, as this is > supposed to be last pull before 4.10

Re: [Intel-gfx] [igvt-g-dev] [PULL] GVT-g device model fixes

2016-11-16 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2016.11.16 15:50:27 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > Please pull current GVT-g device model fixes. > Sorry, pls hold on this as found a possible conflict, as this is supposed to be last pull before 4.10 merge window, like to include the fix for that, will send update later. > Thanks.