On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:08:18AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Well strictly speaking you don't need to do any platform matrix
> testing for an r-b. :) But yes, the situation you are seeing on BSW
> needs to be resolved.
As discussed on IRC, it does seem to be unreproducible on !bsw (the
presum
On 08/03/16 10:16, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:50:46PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
Yes, patch is sane, I'm just messing around with my Braswell at the
moment and then I'll try again at getting some numbers. First glance
said 10% in reducing latency (with a 100% throughput impr
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:50:46PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Yes, patch is sane, I'm just messing around with my Braswell at the
> moment and then I'll try again at getting some numbers. First glance
> said 10% in reducing latency (with a 100% throughput improvement in one
> particular small cop
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:47:14PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 03/03/16 11:02, Patchwork wrote:
> >== Series Details ==
> >
> >Series: drm/i915: Move CSB MMIO reads out of the execlists lock (rev2)
> >URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3973/
> >State : warning
> >
> >== Summa
On 03/03/16 11:02, Patchwork wrote:
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Move CSB MMIO reads out of the execlists lock (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3973/
State : warning
== Summary ==
Series 3973v2 drm/i915: Move CSB MMIO reads out of the execlists lock
http://pat
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Move CSB MMIO reads out of the execlists lock (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3973/
State : warning
== Summary ==
Series 3973v2 drm/i915: Move CSB MMIO reads out of the execlists lock
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3
